2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
Make | Cadillac | Matra-Simca |
Model | BLS | M25 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 365 Nm | 363 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |