2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1990 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 166 kg more than 1990 Mercury Sable.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1990 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
| Model | BLS | Sable |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1990 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2511 cc |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
