2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 531 kg more than 1990 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | BLS | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2009 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1910 mm |