2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1992 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Tracer. (127 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 462 kg more than 1992 Mercury Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mercury Tracer. (154 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1992 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | BLS | Tracer |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1839 cc |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |