2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | BLS | TL |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3200 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2840 mm |