2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (160 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 355 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | BLS | Blazer |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 4296 cc |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 345 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |