2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 261 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | BLS | Armadillo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 1850 mm |
