2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma has manual transmission. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | BLS | Carisma |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1870 cc |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |