2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1997 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura TL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | BLS | TL |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2840 mm |