2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (582 HP) has 330 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 weights approximately 667 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (773 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm). This means 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: