2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1997 Suzuki C2

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 712 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac BLS 1997 Suzuki C2
Make Cadillac Suzuki
Model BLS C2
Year Released 2009 1997
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 176 HP 251 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 265 Nm 284 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 848 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 3660 mm
Vehicle Width 1460 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1230 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2240 mm