2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 939 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1998 Rover Mini | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | BLS | Mini |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 696 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |
