2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Recon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Recon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Recon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 2000 Oldsmobile Recon | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | BLS | Recon |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 68 L |
