2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 333 kg more than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | BLS | XR 8 Xplod |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 469 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1302 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 132 L |
