2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2001 Lada Roadster
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lada Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lada Roadster would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Roadster. (116 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Roadster. 2001 Lada Roadster has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lada Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2001 Lada Roadster | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | BLS | Roadster |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1497 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 116 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |