2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 190 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | BLS | Nea |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2590 mm |