2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 200 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2001 Nissan MM | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | BLS | MM |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 372 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 106 L |