2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 319 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (265 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | BLS | Ram |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 408 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1879 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3530 mm |