2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (179 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 464 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (400 Nm @ 1850 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2002 Ford Ka | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | BLS | Ka |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1850 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 42 L |