2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2002 Jaguar X400
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (320 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2002 Jaguar X400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | BLS | X400 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 525 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 69 L |