2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 2002 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2002 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 2002 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | BLS | Colt |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2351 cc |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
