2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2002 Samsung SM3

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Samsung SM3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Samsung SM3 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 475 kg more than 2002 Samsung SM3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac BLS 2002 Samsung SM3
Make Cadillac Samsung
Model BLS SM3
Year Released 2009 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2792 cc 1497 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 252 HP 95 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 365 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1160 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2540 mm