2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar X-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar X-Type would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (390 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 133 kg more than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (443 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac BLS 2003 Jaguar X-Type
Make Cadillac Jaguar
Model BLS X-Type
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2792 cc 1996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 252 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 365 Nm 443 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74.8 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 18.2:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1502 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 5.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 61 L