2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP) has 174 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 590 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | BLS | Smart |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1124 cc |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 47 L |