2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2003 Renault Clio

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (251 HP @ 7150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 105 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac BLS 2003 Renault Clio
Make Cadillac Renault
Model BLS Clio
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 2792 cc 2946 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 252 HP 251 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 7150 RPM
Torque 365 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4650 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89.1 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74.8 mm 82.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 3850 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2850 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 11.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 60 L