2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2004 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 395 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2004 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | BLS | Astro |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 4294 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 102 L |