2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2004 Citroen C3
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (88 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 565 kg more than 2004 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C3. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 2004 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | BLS | C3 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1360 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 45 L |
