2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (211 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 209 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | BLS | Dakota |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3687 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 83 L |