2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (239 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 285 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac BLS 2004 Mercury Mountaineer
Make Cadillac Mercury
Model BLS Mountaineer
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2792 cc 4604 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 252 HP 239 HP
Torque 365 Nm 382 Nm
Engine Bore Size 89.1 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74.8 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.4:1
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1920 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2920 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 85 L