2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 190 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (372 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (265 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | BLS | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3489 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 80 L |
