2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Oldsmobile Alero would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 207 kg more than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. (203 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | BLS | Alero |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2196 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 140 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1359 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 53 L |