2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2004 Volkswagen Concept T
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Concept T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Concept T would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Concept T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Concept T. (238 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Concept T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 304 kg more than 2004 Volkswagen Concept T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volkswagen Concept T is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Concept T will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Concept T. (320 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Concept T. 2004 Volkswagen Concept T has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Volkswagen Concept T will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 2004 Volkswagen Concept T | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | BLS | Concept T |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 95.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.3:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7 seconds | 6.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1331 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1970 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 34 L |
