2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 220 kg more than 2005 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | BLS | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 65 L |