2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (165 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 121 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | BLS | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2491 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 220 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 64 L |