2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo V50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo V50 would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2005 Volvo V50. (218 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 161 kg more than 2005 Volvo V50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volvo V50. (320 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volvo V50.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | BLS | V50 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2519 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 60 L |