2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | BLS | I-350 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3458 cc |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 74 L |
