2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 3,828 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero. (201 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero. (314 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | BLS | Pajero |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3828 cc |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 314 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 15.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 90 L |