2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 2008 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | BLS | Epica |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
