2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (265 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | BLS | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3979 cc |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 72 L |