2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2010 Holden Calais

To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac BLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac BLS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS.

Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Calais. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac BLS 2010 Holden Calais
Make Cadillac Holden
Model BLS Calais
Year Released 2009 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2792 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 252 HP 278 HP
Torque 365 Nm 350 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 9.3 L/100km