2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac BLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac BLS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | BLS | 200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3600 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 64 L |