2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2011 Holden Epica

To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac BLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac BLS would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 320 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 2011 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac BLS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac BLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac BLS 2011 Holden Epica
Make Cadillac Holden
Model BLS Epica
Year Released 2009 2011
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1910 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 148 HP
Torque 320 Nm 320 Nm
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4805 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.1 L/100km 7.5 L/100km