2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac BLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac BLS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2011 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden UTE.
Because 2011 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | BLS | UTE |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 365 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |