2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac BLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac BLS would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (320 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | BLS | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2987 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 80 L |