2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac BLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac BLS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 380 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | BLS | Roadster |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3758 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1391 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 50 L |