2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1966 Moretti 850S
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Moretti 850S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Moretti 850S would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 506 more horse power than 1966 Moretti 850S. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1966 Moretti 850S.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Moretti 850S. (55 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Moretti 850S.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 1966 Moretti 850S | |
Make | Cadillac | Moretti |
Model | CTS-V | 850S |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 30 L |