2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 495 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | CTS-V | 66 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6162 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 542 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
