2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1982 Talbot Samba
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Talbot Samba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Talbot Samba would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP) has 452 more horse power than 1982 Talbot Samba. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1982 Talbot Samba.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Talbot Samba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 448 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Talbot Samba. (102 Nm @ 5400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Talbot Samba.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 1982 Talbot Samba | |
Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
Model | CTS-V | Samba |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 1219 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 550 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 40 L |