2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1985 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 407 more horse power than 1985 Caterham 1700. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Caterham 1700. (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 1985 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
Model | CTS-V | 1700 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2240 mm |