2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1996 Saturn SL
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Saturn SL would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 442 more horse power than 1996 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1996 Saturn SL.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 1996 Saturn SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Saturn |
Model | CTS-V | SL |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |